Man a Duality
Some of the terms used
in Yoga are necessarily to be known. For
Yoga takes man for a
special purpose and studies him for a
special end and,
therefore, only troubles itself about two great
facts regarding man,
mind and body. First, he is a unit, a unit
of consciousness. That
is a point to be definitely grasped. There
is only one of him in
each set of envelopes, and sometimes the
Theosophist has to
revise his ideas about man when he begins this
practical line.
Theosophy quite usefully and rightly, for the
understanding of the
human constitution, divides man into many
parts and pieces. We
talk of physical, astral, mental, etc. Or we
talk about
Sthula-sarira, Sukshma-sarira, Karana-sarira, and so
on. Sometimes we
divide man into Anna-maya-kosa, Prana-maya-kosa,
Mano-maya-kosa, etc.
We divide man into so many pieces in order
to study him
thoroughly, that we can hardly find the man because
of the pieces. This
is, so to say, for the study of human anatomy
and physiology.
But Yoga is practical
and psychological. I am not complaining of
the various
sub-divisions of other systems. They are necessary
for the purpose of
those systems. But Yoga, for its practical
purposes, considers
man simply as a dualityÄmind and body, a unit
of consciousness in a
set of envelopes. This is not the duality
of the Self and the
Not-Self. For in Yoga, "Self" includes
consciousness plus
such matter as it cannot distinguish from
itself, and Not-Self
is only the matter it can put aside.
Man is not pure Self,
pure consciousness, Samvid. That is an
abstraction. In the
concrete universe there are always the Self
and His sheaths,
however tenuous the latter may be, so that a
unit of consciousness
is inseparable from matter, and a Jivatma,
or Monad, is
invariably consciousness plus matter.
In order that this may
come out clearly, two terms are used in
Yoga as constituting
manÄPrana and Pradhana, life-breath and
matter. Prana is not
only the life-breath of the body, but the
totality of the life
forces of the universe or, in other words,
the life-side of the
universe.
"I am
Prana," says Indra. Prana here means the totality of the
life-forces. They are
taken as consciousness, mind. Pradhana is
the term used for
matter. Body, or the opposite of mind, means
for the yogi in
practice so much of the appropriated matter of
the outer world as he
is able to put away from himself, to
distinguish from his
own consciousness.
This division is very
significant and useful, if you can catch
clearly hold of the
root idea. Of course, looking at the thing
from beginning to end,
you will see Prana, the great Life, the
great Self, always
present in all, and you will see the
envelopes, the bodies,
the sheaths, present at the different
stages, taking
different forms; but from the standpoint of yogic
practice, that is
called Prana, or Self, with which the man
identifies himself for
the time, including every sheath of matter
from which the man is
unable to separate himself in
consciousness. That
unit, to the yogi, is the Self, so that it is
a changing quantity.
As he drops off one sheath after another and
says: " That is
not myself," he is coming nearer and nearer to
his highest point, to
consciousness in a single film, in a single
atom of matter, a
Monad. For all practical purposes of Yoga, the
man, the working,
conscious man, is so much of him as he cannot
separate from the
matter enclosing him, or with which he is
connected. Only that
is body which the man is able to put aside
and say: "This is
not I, but mine." We find we have a whole
series of terms in
Yoga which may be repeated over and over
again. All the states
of mind exist on every plane, says Vyasa,
and this way of
dealing with man enables the same significant
words, as we shall see
in a moment, to be used over and over
again, with an ever
subtler connotation; they all become
relative, and are
equally true at each stage of evolution.
Now it is quite clear
that, so far as many of us are concerned,
the physical body is
the only thing of which we can say: " It is
not myself "; so
that, in the practice of Yoga at first, for you,
all the words that
would be used in it to describe the states of
consciousness, the
states of mind, would deal with the waking
consciousness in the
body as the lowest state, and, rising up
from that, all the
words would be relative terms, implying a
distinct and
recognisable state of the mind in relation to that
which is the lowest.
In order to know how you shall begin to
apply to yourselves
the various terms used to describe the states
of mind, you must
carefully analyse your own consciousness, and
find out how much of
it is really consciousness, and how much is
matter so closely
appropriated that you cannot separate it from
yourself.
No comments:
Post a Comment