Methods of Yoga
With regard to what I
have just called the two great methods in
Yoga, we find that by
one of these a man treads the path of
knowledge by
Buddhi--the pure reason; and the other the same path
by Manas--the concrete
mind. You may remember that in speaking
yesterday of the sub-
divisions of Antah-karana, I pointed out to
you that there we had
a process of reflection of one quality in
another; and within
the limits of the cognitional aspect of the
Self, you find Buddhi,
cognition reflected in cognition; and
Ahamkara, cognition
reflected in will; and Manas, cognition
reflected in activity.
Bearing those three sub-divisions in mind,
you will very readily
be able to see that these two methods of
Yoga fall naturally
under two of these heads. But what of the
third? What of the
will, of which Ahamkara is the representative
in cognition? That
certainly has its road, but it can scarcely be
said to be a
"method". Will breaks its way upwards by sheer
unflinching
determination, keeping its eyes fixed on the end, and
using either buddhi or
manes indifferently as a means to that
end. Metaphysics is
used to realise the Self; science is used to
understand the
Not-Self; but either is grasped, either is thrown
aside, as it serves,
or fails to serve, the needs of the moment.
Often the man, in whom
will is predominant, does not know how he
gains the object he is
aiming at; it comes to his hands, but the
"how" is
obscure to him; he willed to have it, and nature gives
it to him. This is
also seen in Yoga in the man of Ahamkara, the
sub-type of will in
cognition. Just as in the man of Ahamkara,
Buddhi and Manas are
subordinate, so in the man of Buddhi,
Ahamkara and Manas are
not absent, but are subordinate; and in
the man of Manas,
Ahamkara and Buddhi are present, but play a
subsidiary part. Both
the metaphysician and the scientist must be
supported by Ahamkara.
That Self-determining faculty, that
deliberate setting of
oneself to a chosen end, that is necessary
in all forms of Yoga.
Whether a Yogi is going to follow the
purely cognitional way
of Buddhi, or whether he is going to
follow the more active
path of Manas, in both cases he needs the
self-determining will
in order to sustain him in his arduous
task. You remember it
is written in the Upanishad that the weak
man cannot reach the Self.
Strength is wanted. Determination is
wanted. Perseverance
is wanted. And you must have, in every
successful Yogi, that
intense determination which is the very
essence of
individuality.
Now what are these two
great methods? One of them may be
described as seeking
the Self by the Self; the other may be
described as seeking
the Self by the Not-Self; and if you will
think of them in that
fashion, I think you will find the idea
illuminative. Those
who seek the Self by the Self, seek him
through the faculty of
Buddhi; they turn ever inwards, and turn
away from the outer
world. Those who seek the Self by the
Not-Self, seek him
through the active working Manas; they are
outward-turned, and by
study of the Not-Self, they learn to
realise the Self. The
one is the path of the metaphysician; the
other is the path of
the scientist.
No comments:
Post a Comment